<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>UFS on iMil.net</title>
    <link>http://imil.net/blog/tags/ufs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in UFS on iMil.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://imil.net/blog/tags/ufs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Migrate FreeBSD root on UFS to ZFS</title>
      <link>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2016/migrate-freebsd-root-on-ufs-to-zfs/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://imil.net/blog/posts/2016/migrate-freebsd-root-on-ufs-to-zfs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;At &lt;em&gt;${DAYJOB}&lt;/em&gt; I&amp;rsquo;m using a &lt;em&gt;FreeBSD&lt;/em&gt; workstation &lt;a href=&#34;http://imil.net/blog/2014/07/02/back-to-2000-2005-freebsd-desktop-2/&#34;&gt;for quite a while&lt;/a&gt;. Everything goes smoothly except for the filesystem. When I first installed it, I chose &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_File_System&#34;&gt;UFS&lt;/a&gt; because &lt;em&gt;FreeBSD&lt;/em&gt; installer said that &lt;em&gt;root-on-ZFS&lt;/em&gt; was &amp;ldquo;experimental&amp;rdquo;. I later learned that nobody uses &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_File_System&#34;&gt;UFS&lt;/a&gt; anymore and that &lt;em&gt;root-on-ZFS&lt;/em&gt; is perfectly stable. Thing is, I chose &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_File_System&#34;&gt;UFS&lt;/a&gt; and I deeply regret it. Not because of &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS&#34;&gt;ZFS&lt;/a&gt;&amp;rsquo;s features that absolutely do not matter for me on the desktop, but because &lt;strong&gt;FreeBSD&lt;/strong&gt; implementation of &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_File_System&#34;&gt;UFS&lt;/a&gt; is terribly, terribly slow when it comes to manipulate big files. When I say slow, I mean that &lt;code&gt;pkg upgrade&lt;/code&gt; tends to &lt;strong&gt;FREEZE&lt;/strong&gt; the entire machine while extracting archives. That slow. And before you ask, yes, there&amp;rsquo;s been a lot of tuning on that side.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
